Chevron

Company Snapshot: 

Chevron, once part of the Standard Oil empire, has grown over the past quarter century into the world’s fourth largest petroleum company, thanks to a series of ambitious acquisitions: Gulf Oil in 1984, Texaco in 2001 and Unocal in 2005. The purchase of Texaco brought with it a massive environmental lawsuit that has dragged on for more than a decade. This is only one of a host of controversies surrounding Chevron’s environmental and human rights record around the world.

Profile editor: 
Phil Mattera
Ownership status: 
Publicly traded
Number of employees worldwide: 
64,000
Chief executive officer: 
John S. Watson
Global Fortune 500 rank: 
5
Tel: 
925-842-1000
Net Income: 
US$10.6 billion
Total revenue: 
US$171.6 billion
Corporate accountability
Accountability overview: 

Chevron is a frequent target of criticism by environmental groups and human rights organizations for its practices in the United States and countries such as Ecuador, Nigeria, Burma, Chad and Angola. Each year many of these organizations get together to publish an alternative annual report called The True Cost of Chevron that documents in great deal the company’s checkered track record.

Tax issues: 

In 1994 Chevron paid $550 million to the Internal Revenue Service to settle a dispute over tax liabilities related to oil purchases from Saudi Arabia.

In 1997 Caltex Petroleum, then a joint venture of Chevron and Texaco, was hit with a tax claim of $2 billion by the Internal Revenue Service relating to crude oil sales to Japan. In 1999 the case was settled for $65 million.

In 2000 Chevron paid the state of Louisiana $9.6 million to settle a dispute concerning oil severance (production) taxes.

In 2002 two accounting professors published a study estimating that Chevron had evaded more than $3 billion in state and federal taxes in the United States through a complex oil pricing scheme involving the company’s operations in Indonesia.

In 2006 the government of Chad ordered Chevron to cease its operations in the country, accusing it and the Malaysian company Petronas of failing to pay some $450 million in taxes on oil production. Chevron later agreed to pay the taxes and was allowed to resume operations.

In 2007 Chevron filed a challenge to the property tax assessment imposed on its refinery in Richmond, California by Contra Costa County. The company claimed it had been overcharged by nearly $60 million. In 2009 an appeals board ruled in its favor but decided on a smaller reduction in valuation than what the company wanted. In April 2010 the county agreed to refund $18 million to the company over the course of two years.

Labor: 

Chevron’s predecessor Standard Oil of California (Socal) shifted from ruthless labor policies early in the century to a policy of paternalism after the First World War, but for years it resisted unionization.

In the late 1910s the Oil Field, Gas Well and Refinery Workers Union was formed, motivated largely by the need to improve conditions at other petroleum companies. Nonetheless, in 1919 the union began a drive to organize Socal's workers—with limited success.

It was not until the 1930s that significant organizing activity resumed in the oil industry. The union, which in 1937 changed its name to the Oil Workers International Union (OWIU), made some gains but not at the Standard Oil companies, where there was a stubborn attempt to maintain company unions instead of independent collective bargaining organizations.

Although explicit company unions were barred by the Wagner Act, such organizations continued to represent workers at Socal, even after a wave of strikes in the 1940s. It was not until the late 1950s that the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers (the successor to the OWIU) was able to organize most of the company. After that Socal (and later Chevron) generally followed industry patterns in dealing with the union, which is now part of the United Steelworkers (USW). In 2009 USW members at Chevron ratified a new three-year industry pattern agreement.

In 2000 about 500 members of the United Mineworkers of America struck Chevron’s Pittsburg & Midway Coal Company for about two months before negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement.

Worker Safety

An explosion and fire in 1989 at the Richmond refinery severely burned three workers. A U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration inspection following the accident found that workers who were responsible for assisting firefighters had not been provided with even basic safety equipment. OSHA later fined the company $877,000 for more than 100 willful and serious violations. After an appeals process the company agreed to improve its company-wide fire protection policy and pay a fine of $275,000.

Environment and product safety: 

Chevron spends heavily on an advertising campaign with the theme “Will You Join Us,” which is apparently meant to give the impression that it is in the vanguard of environmental reform and all-around socially responsible behavior. It presumably is also meant to deflect attention away from the fact that for more than two decades Chevron has had a far-from-unblemished track environmental track record of its own.

Some of the company's worst sins have taken place in Richmond, California, where it has a petroleum refinery and other facilities. A local group called Citizens for a Better Environment published a report in 1989 that acknowledged that Chevron had reduced waste-water discharges at the facility but said that toxic air emissions were still at unacceptably high levels. In 1988 the company paid $550,000 to settle a state lawsuit brought in connection with toxic emissions at the plant.

That same year the company paid a fine of $1.5 million to the EPA for waste-water discharges at its El Segundo refinery near Los Angeles. The federal agency said that there had been some 880 violations of pollution laws at the facility since 1981.

In 1992 Chevron pleaded guilty to criminal and civil charges in connection with violations of the Clean Water Act at an offshore drilling platform in the Santa Barbara Channel and paid $8 million in fines. That same year it paid $1 million in penalties for Clean Air Act violations at its refinery in Philadelphia.

In 1993 Chevron paid $500,000 in fines after pleading no contest to charges of misdemeanor criminal violations of California law in connection with a 1991 oil spill off El Segundo.

Also in 1993 the EPA proposed a fine of $17 million against Chevron for violations of the Toxic Substances Control Act. The dispute was later settled, with Chevron paying only $375,000.

In 1996 Chevron agreed to pay $700,000 to settle charges that its refinery in Perth Amboy, New Jersey violated the Clean Air Act through sulfur dioxide emissions.

In 1997 Chevron agreed to pay $1.1 million to settle U.S. Interior Department civil charges that the company violated critical safety regulations at an offshore drilling platform near Ventura, California.

In 1998 Chevron agreed to pay $540,000 to settle charges brought by EPA that the company bypassed a wastewater treatment system at its Richmond refinery, resulting in toxic releases into the San Pablo Bay over a period of five years.

In 2000 the company paid $7 million to settle charges of Clean Air Act violations at an offshore loading terminal near El Segundo.

In 2001 Chevron agreed to pay $750,000 to settle charges that its oil production facilities in Rangely, Colorado violated the Clean Water Act during a spill in 1995. The company also agreed to make improvements at the site.

In 2001 a group of companies including Chevron settled a lawsuit that had been brought by Communities for a Better Environment over the contamination of ground water in California by the carcinogenic gasoline additive MTBE. In the wake of that agreement Chevron faced a series of other MTBE cases in California and other states. In 2008 Chevron and several other oil majors agreed to pay $422 million to settle suits that had been brought by public water systems in 20 states and consolidated in federal court.

In 2002 Chevron was fined $2 million by the government of Angola for environmental damage caused by leaks in pipes used to transport oil from offshore drilling platforms. A government investigation had found that the pipes were not properly maintained.

In 2003 Chevron reached a settlement with the U.S. Justice Department and the Environmental Protection Agency in which it agreed to spend about $275 million to reduce airborne emissions from five of its U.S. refineries in California, Hawaii, Mississippi and Utah.

In 2004 Chevron Phillips Chemical agreed to pay a $1.8 million civil penalty for Clean Air Act violations that led to two explosions and releases of toxic chemicals at a manufacturing facility in Pasadena, Texas in 1999 and 2000.

In 2007 Chevron agreed to pay $1 million to settle civil charges that had been brought against it by the state of New Jersey in connection with a spill of more than 100,000 gallons of crude oil into Arthur Kill off Perth Amboy in 2006.

In 2009 Chevron was ordered by the United Kingdom Environment Agency to pay a fine of £11,500 in connection with a diesel spill at the company’s Poole Harbor oil terminal three years earlier.

In January 2010 the EPA’s criminal investigation division seized computers and records at Chevron’s oil facilities at Cook Inlet in Alaska. According to the Anchorage Daily News, the agency is investigating whether the company knowingly violated its air pollution permits at the locations.

In April 2010 at least 18,000 gallons of oil were spilled into the waters of the Delta National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana as a result of an accident involving a pipeline owned by a joint venture of Chevron and British Petroleum.

Chevron reports that as of the end of 2009 it had been identified as a potentially responsible party at about 250 Superfund toxic waste sites in the United States.

See also the discussion of Ecuador and Nigeria in the human rights section below.

Human rights: 

Ecuador. When Chevron took over Texaco it also acquired a long-standing controversy over the company’s operations in Ecuador. For nearly a decade, Texaco had been fighting a lawsuit charging that it had engaged in a massive amount of toxic dumping over the course of two decades. After their case was blocked in U.S. federal court, the plaintiffs in 2003 filed a $1 billion action against ChevronTexaco in Ecuador. Critics confronted the company over the issue at events such as its annual meeting. At the 2005 meeting then-CEO David O’Reilly shut down the floor microphone before a prominent Ecuadorian rainforest leader had a chance to speak about the environmental impact of the company’s operations.

Chevron lobbied the Bush Administration to use trade sanctions to get Ecuador to drop the case, but the suit continued. As it was reaching its conclusion in 2009 there were reports that the company could face damages as high as $27 billion, making it the world’s large environmental lawsuit. The Amazon Defense Coalition criticized the company for not disclosing the full extent of the potential liability to its shareholders.

In August 2009 the case took an unexpected turn when Chevron claimed it had video evidence that the judge in the case was being bribed by Ecuadoran government officials. The judge withdrew from the case, but Chevron kept up the pressure. It filed an arbitration action through a United Nations trade commission and demanded that the government pay the company’s legal fees and “moral damages” because of its alleged interference in the lawsuit. Later, questions were raised about the integrity of the evidence and of the two businessmen who had secretly taped the judge. In March 2010 a U.S. federal judge ruled against an effort by the government of Ecuador to bar Chevron from proceeding with the UN arbitration action.

Nigeria. Like Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron was a target of criticism during the 1990s for its ties to the repressive government in Nigeria. In 1998 journalist Amy Goodman reported that Chevron officials helped facilitate an assault by Nigerian troops on protesters who were occupying an offshore oil platform in the Niger Delta. Two protestors were killed and others were taken into custody and allegedly tortured by Nigerian authorities. It later came out that Nigerian soldiers billed Chevron for their services.

In 1999 a group of Nigerian citizens filed a lawsuit against Chevron in U.S. federal court under the Alien Tort Claims Act. The case finally came to trial in 2008. After weeks of testimony, a jury found that Chevron was not legally responsible for what happened to the protestors. The plaintiffs have appealed.

Chad and Cameroon. In 2005 Amnesty International published a report warning that an oil pipeline project in Chad and Cameroon led by Exxon Mobil and Chevron threatened human rights in the two African countries because the agreement signed by the companies and the two governments (which have a poor track record in respecting rights) put such a high premium on maintaining the financial stability of the project.

Burma. In 2008 EarthRights International accused Chevron of complicity in human rights abuses in the areas around the natural gas pipeline it co-owns in Burma.

Political influence (national and international): 

In 2010 Oxfam America launched a campaign to get Chevron to make full disclosure of its payments to governments around the world. The goal is to make sure "citizens can use the information to track how revenues are being used to promote health, education, and other measures to fight poverty."

Royalty Payments

In 2000 Chevron agreed to pay $95 million to settle civil charges that it shortchanged the U.S. federal government on the payment of royalties on oil extracted from public and Native American lands. In 2009 the company agreed to pay $45.9 million to settle another royalty underpayment case brought by the federal government.

Chevron became a major beneficiary of an expensive mistake by the U.S. Interior Department, which in the late 1990s had failed to write a provision into many offshore oil leases to restore royalty rates to normal levels after they had been reduced during a period of low oil prices. When Chevron and a group of other companies made a major find in the Gulf of Mexico in 2006, it was estimated that the contract snafu would allow the firms to avoid paying more than $1 billion in royalties.

In 2008 Chevron was reported to be one of the oil companies that gave prohibited gifts and otherwise helped corrupt some of the employees of the Interior Department agency responsible for overseeing the federal royalty program.

Questionable Payments

In 2004 there were reports that Chevron was among the companies being investigated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for making questionable payments to members of the ruling elite in the African country of Equatorial Guinea, including dictator Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo. No charges were ever filed.

In 2007 Chevron agreed to pay $30 million to settle charges relating to illegal payments made to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq under the United Nations Oil for Food Program.

CrocTail subsidiary information
Embedded CrocTail tool for interactively exploring information on company subsidiaries parsed from SEC filings. More information...
croctail_subsidiary_panel: 

History
During the 1860s there were numerous attempts in California to repeat Edwin Drake's 1859 discovery of oil in Pennsylvania, which gave rise to the U.S. petroleum industry. Although widespread drilling failed to yield dramatic results, a hardy band of entrepreneurs kept the faith while fighting among each other over leases and deeds. Among these were San Francisco businessman Charles N. Felton and oil prospector Frederick Taylor, who in 1879 formed the Pacific Coast Oil Company (PCO).

PCO's drilling began to achieve some success, and within a few years it had built pipelines from producing areas such as Moody Gulch in California’s Santa Clara County to a refinery it constructed in Alameda, across the bay from San Francisco. The refinery was the largest facility of its kind west of Cleveland. PCO also built the first steel tanker in order to carry crude from the town of Ventura, near the Pico Canyon fields north of Los Angeles, to the Alameda refinery.

During the 1880s PCO faced increased competition, most notably from the Standard Oil empire, which was shipping oil from the east via ships traveling around Cape Horn. Using its Iowa subsidiary, Standard moved to capture much of the market for kerosene, gasoline, naphtha, and other products. Then in the 1890s, as oil was discovered underneath Los Angeles, Standard entered the production end of the business in the West, buying existing operations and creating new ones. In 1900 PCO gave up the battle and sold out to Standard. Six years later the Rockefeller empire consolidated its West Coast holdings as Standard Oil Company (California).

California Standard got itself into a long-running battle with the federal government over its right to drill on federal land—a dispute that ended in compromise. A more profound legal confrontation for the company and the rest of the Standard empire came in 1906, when the federal government brought an antitrust suit against the group. After five years of legal proceedings the Supreme Court ordered the breakup of the Rockefeller trust into some 30 separate companies, including Standard Oil (California).

Once independent, California Standard stepped up its exploration activities, sending drilling parties to such countries as Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and the Philippines. In 1926 the company merged with Pacific Oil Co., a subsidiary of the Southern Pacific Railway, and through the resulting reorganization took the parentheses out of its name and began calling itself Standard Oil of California, or Socal for short. The following year it supplied the fuel used by Charles Lindbergh in his historic trans-Atlantic flight.

During the 1930s Socal focused its exploration efforts on the Middle East, first by obtaining a concession in Bahrain. The effort paid off, but the company already had its eye on a much larger territory: the nearby kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Socal's more powerful competitors, Standard Oil of New Jersey and Royal Dutch/Shell, had shown little interest in the Saudi territory, which was part of the region covered by the 1928 Red Line Agreement. That pact committed the leading producers to cooperate with one another on any projects within the confines of the old Ottoman Empire.

Socal was not part of the Red Line arrangement, so it was free to explore in Saudi Arabia on its own. In 1933 it was granted a concession by King Ibn Saud that turned out to contain the largest oil reserves in the world. The oil was so plentiful that Socal brought in Texaco to form a joint marketing company they dubbed Caltex. Even that was not sufficient, so in 1944 the two companies formed the Arabian American Oil Company, or Aramco, which soon took on Jersey Standard and Socony as partners.

After the Second World War the company grew along with the development of the West Coast, but it also expanded its refining and marketing operations to the Eastern Seaboard. In 1961 Socal merged with Standard Oil Company (Kentucky), the leading marketer in five Southern states. The company continued its foreign exploration and production in places such as Indochina, Libya, Nigeria, and the North Sea, but it remained highly dependent on the output from Saudi Arabia. Control of the Saudi operations was taken over by the government of that country in 1980.

The California company was slow in joining the diversification trend among the oil majors. It finally made its move in 1979 with a takeover bid for the mining giant AMAX. When the board of AMAX rebuffed Socal it backed off. The same thing happened two years later when Socal came courting again with a higher bid.

Socal next assumed the industry spotlight in 1984, amid the challenges posed by maverick oilman T. Boone Pickens, Jr. to the petroleum giants. When Pickens turned his sights on Gulf Oil, the Pittsburgh company turn to Socal as a white knight. Socal, which changed its name to Chevron during this period, ended up acquiring Gulf for some $13.2 billion.

Gulf had its beginnings in the discovery of oil in Texas in the first years of the century. The Mellon family of Pittsburgh helped finance the pioneering J.M. Guffey Petroleum Co. and built a refining operation at Port Arthur on the Gulf of Mexico. In 1907 the two operations were combined as Gulf Oil, which became a formidable competitor to the Standard Oil trust. Gulf later was among the U.S. companies to participate in the Iraq Petroleum Company and was a party to the Red Line Agreement. It won a concession in Kuwait in partnership with Anglo-Iranian. In the 1970s Gulf was rocked by revelations that it had made large amounts of illegal campaign contributions in the United States and payoffs to government officials abroad. The scandal resulted in the resignations of several top executives.

Chevron's purchase of Gulf was hailed for greatly expanding the company's production capacity and its marketing network, but it also created a huge debt load. To help relieve the burden Chevron sold just under half of Gulf's Canadian operations to the Reichmann family of Toronto for $2.5 billion.

Chevron came under fire from the Right in the late 1980s for maintaining its investment in Angola (which it inherited from Gulf) and from the Left for its operations in South Africa. In 1988 Chevron purchased Tenneco's oil and gas reserves in the Gulf of Mexico. The following year Chevron found itself the subject of a possible takeover after Pennzoil used much of the $3 billion it won in its legal battle with Texaco to buy a block of Chevron stock. The California company rebuffed Pennzoil by getting a large portion of its stock into friendly hands through an employee stock ownership plan.

Faced with continuing financial problems, Chevron launched an aggressive cost-cutting effort in the early 1990s that included a reduction in its refining capacity and the elimination of several thousand jobs. Yet it also decided to spend some $10 billion to develop vast oil reserves in Kazakhstan and build a pipeline from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea.

During the late 1990s Chevron made unsuccessful bids for Atlantic Richfield and Amoco, but things turned out differently when it made an offer to acquire Texaco in 1999. In October 2000 Chevron was able to announce that it would purchase Texaco in a deal worth $36 billion; the deal took effect in 2001. The combined company, the world’s fourth largest oil major, would be called ChevronTexaco.

Texaco began as the Texas Company, one of the most successful producers in the early years of the oil industry in the Southwest. It joined with Socal to exploit the vast reserves of Saudi Arabia in the 1930s and had controversial dealings with Franco and Hitler. After World War II Texaco spread across the country and came to be regarded as one of the Seven Sisters. During the 1980s the company was hit with a multi-billion-dollar verdict in connection with its acquisition of Getty Oil. It declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy and then faced pressure from corporate raider Carl Icahn (who had acquired more than 12 percent of its stock) to liquidate assets.

In 2005 ChevronTexaco boosted its size once again by agreeing to pay $17 billion for Unocal, a large independent with oil reserves in Azerbaijan, Indonesia and the Gulf of Mexico. It beat out a competing bid from China’s CNOOC Limited in part by whipping up fears of foreign ownership. That same year the company changed its name back to Chevron.

Chevron’s anti-Chinese stance in the battle for Unocal did not prevent it from making a deal with PetroChina in 2007 to develop a major natural gas field in Sichuan Province. It also moved ahead with numerous other foreign ventures such as a natural gas project in the Gulf of Thailand and drilling off the shore of Newfoundland.

In 2008 Chevron was chosen to become one of the 30 stocks making up the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Financial information
Stock ticker symbol: 
CVX
Fiscal year: 
2009
Fiscal year: 
2009
Major lines of business/segments: 

Upstream: Chevron has oil and natural gas production operations in more than two dozen countries. In 2009 it produced an average of 2.7 million barrels of oil a day, with the largest amounts coming from the United States, Indonesia, Nigeria, Thailand and Angola. It produced an average of 5 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, with the largest amounts coming from the United States, Thailand, Australia, Bangladesh and Indonesia. Chevron has exploration activities in North America (especially the Gulf of Mexico), Africa (Angola, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, etc.), Asia (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, etc.) and in other parts of the world. Chevron has a 20 percent interest in the controversial Athabasca Oil Sands Project and a 60 percent interest in the Ells River oil sands project, both in Canada.

Downstream: Chevron has total refining capacity of about 2.1 million barrels of crude oil per day at nine of its own refineries and eight refineries run by affiliates. Chevron’s own refineries consist of six in the United States (two in California and one each in Hawaii, Mississippi, New Jersey and Utah) and one each in Canada, South Africa and the United Kingdom. Its petroleum products are marketed throughout the world under the names Chevron, Texaco and Caltex. At the end of 2009 there were 9,600 Chevron and Texaco-branded service stations in the United States, most of them independently owned.

Chemicals: Chevron Phillips Chemical Company (CPChem) is jointly owned with ConocoPhillips. At the end of 2009, CPChem owned or had joint-venture interests in 34 manufacturing facilities and five research and technical centers in Belgium, Brazil, China, Colombia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea and the United States.

Other: Chevron has smaller operations in coal mining, power generation (including geothermal plants in Indonesia and the Philippines) and solar energy.