Syncrude Canada Ltd.

Last edited by lenazun on November 25, 2009 - 7:59pm
Profile editor: 
Phil Mattera
Company Snapshot: 

Syncrude Canada is one of the leading players in the big, dirty business of extracting oil from the tar sands of northern Alberta. It is a joint venture owned by an investment trust and a group of six U.S., Canadian and Japanese oil companies, among them the Canadian subsidiary of ExxonMobil. The company has been targeted by environmental groups because of its large volume of greenhouse gas emissions, but Syncrude has experienced a higher degree of controversy over an incident in 2008 in which some 1,600 ducks were killed at one of the company waste ponds.

Ownership status: 
Publicly traded
Number of employees worldwide: 
5,000
Chief executive officer: 
Tom Katinas
Tel: 
780-790-6403
Total revenue: 
US$3.5 billion
Corporate accountability
Labor: 

Starting in the late 1970s various labor unions attempted to organize Syncrude’s workers, but they found limited support. The numerous perks provided by the company to lure workers to toil in the remote and harsh conditions of the tar sands apparently outweighed any desire for collective bargaining. Another factor was the company’s policy of keeping its wage and benefits on a par with unionized competitors such as Suncor Energy. This was essential given that the major tar sands producers all embarked on major expansions that required large numbers of workers.

Environment and product safety: 

As early as 1981 Syncrude was being cited as a major polluter and a frequent violator of Alberta’s Clean Air Act for excessive emission of hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide. Like the other tar sands producers, it eventually became a target of criticism because of the large quantities of greenhouse gas emissions generated by its production processes.

Syncrude also continued to face problems as basic as harsh smells. In 2006 it had to stop work on a huge expansion project for nearly two months because noxious odors from a de-sulfurization unit were reaching residential areas of Fort McMurray.

Syncrude has been placed among Canada’s ten largest polluters in rankings done by Environmental Defence and the Canadian Environmental Law Association. In those rankings Syncrude was cited as one of the main reasons Alberta accounted for about 40 percent of Canada’s total greenhouse gas emissions.

A 2008 assessment by WWF-Canada and the Pembina Institute of the environmental management practices of all the tar sands projects in Alberta ranked Syncrude second to last.

It turned out that incidents rather than rankings would do more to mar the company’s environmental reputation with the public. In 2007 Syncrude caused a stir when it forced an 85-year-old activist from Colorado to remove from her website photographs that she had taken during a public tour of its tar sands operations.

A much bigger controversy erupted in 2008 after a large number of ducks landed on a Syncrude tailings pond and died after being coated in residual oil that lies of the surface of the water. The system normally used to scare birds away from the pond was not in operation at the time. The company publicly apologized for the incident, but the public outcry did not die down. Environmental groups held protests, and a group of activists from Greenpeace invaded the Syncrude operation and unfurled a banner near the tailings pond where the ducks had been killed. Syncrude brought suit against the group in retaliation.

Provincial officials launched an investigation but delayed making a decision on whether to bring charges against the company. In January 2009 activist Jeh Custer pressed the issue by launching a private prosecution of the company. The following month provincial and federal charges were finally brought against Syncrude for violation of environmental and wildlife-protection laws. It later came to light that the death toll of the ducks was actually more than 1,600. In September 2009 the company entered a plea of not guilty.

History

Syncrude has its origins in an early 1960s decision by the government of Alberta to develop the tar sands in the northern part of the province. The Canadian subsidiaries of four U.S. oil companies—Exxon (then known as Standard Oil of New Jersey), Gulf Oil, Atlantic Richfield and Cities Service—formed a consortium called Syncrude Canada to build a facility to compete with the one developed by Sun Oil’s Great Canadian Oil Sands. It received approval for a production facility in 1969 and began construction four years later.

The project nearly collapsed when Atlantic Richfield, which had committed C$1 billion, dropped out in 1974. It was saved when the Canadian federal government and the provincial governments of Alberta and Ontario stepped in with a combined C$500 million investment, and the other partners upped their commitments to make up the rest. Alberta also agreed to finance a C$500 million pipeline to carry oil from the sands to market. Production began in 1978.

Within a few years other Canadian oil companies joined the consortium, and Ontario withdrew. By the mid-1980s Syncrude was seeking permission for a C$4 billion expansion of its operation, which was intended to increase output from about 130,000 barrels a day to 200,000.

During the 1990s Alberta reduced its holdings (and later withdrew entirely), and the line-up of other minority investors frequently changed. Under the leadership of CEO Eric Newell, the company continued an aggressive expansion program. In 1997 it announced a plan to spend C$3 billion to increase daily output, with an eventual goal of 480,000 barrels.

Two of the minority holdings were converted into investment trusts, and they merged in 2001 to form the Canadian Oil Sands Trust, Syncrude’s second biggest shareholder. (In 2003 it became the largest.) The price of Syncrude’s expansions climbed sharply as a result of cost overruns.

A C$4 billion project approved in 2001 was estimated to cost C$5.6 billion a year later, creating unrest among the consortium’s owners. In 2003 the CEO’s job was taken over by Charles Ruigrok of Imperial Oil, the ExxonMobil subsidiary that was Syncrude’s second largest shareholder. Imperial was later chosen by Syncrude to provide a wide range of management services.

In 2006 the company completed its Stage 3 expansion project known as UE-1, which boosted daily output to 350,000 barrels. The cost of the operation had risen to C$8.4 billion.

Although authorities in Alberta routinely approved Syncrude’s expansion plans, the company clashed with the province on royalty issues. In 2008 Syncrude agreed to pay an additional C$975 million for the period from 2010 to 2015. Yet the following year there were reports that the company stood to gain an extra C$18 billion over the longer term by exercising an option it had negotiated with the province in 1997.

Other Information: 

As of October 2009, the owners of Syncrude were:

- Canadian Oil Sands Limited (investment trust) – 36.74 percent

- Imperial Oil Resources (owned by ExxonMobil) – 25 percent

- Petro-Canada Oil and Gas (owned by Suncor Energy) – 12 percent

- Conoco-Phillips Oil Sands Partnership II (owned by ConocoPhillips) – 9.03 percent

- Nexen Oil Sands Partnership (owned by Nexen Inc.) – 7.23 percent

- Murphy Oil Company Ltd. (owned by Murphy Oil Corporation) – 5 percent

- Mocal Energy Limited (owned by Nippon Oil) – 5 percent

Financial information
Fiscal year: 
2008